Three Forks Formation | Kingdom Exploration Review | Williston Basin's Hidden Stacked Pay

Browse Formations
94 Formations

Three Forks Formation

The Bakken's Deeper Sibling - 7.4 Billion Barrels Combined Resource

Sean Pruitt, Owner - Kingdom Exploration December 2025 Williston Basin
Location
North Dakota / Montana / Saskatchewan
Williams County, ND; McKenzie County, ND; Mountrail County, ND; Richland County, MT
47.8000°N, 103.5000°W
View on Map
Key Reservoir Properties
Geologic Age:
Upper Devonian
Lithology:
Dolomite, siltstone, shale
Depth Range:
9,000 - 11,500 ft
Avg Thickness:
250 ft
Porosity:
4-10%
Oil Gravity:
42.0° API
Productive Area:
10,000,000 acres
Remaining Potential:
4,300.0 MM bbls

Executive Summary

The Three Forks Formation represents the next frontier in Williston Basin development—a deeper unconventional target directly beneath the prolific Bakken Shale. With the Bakken in a mature phase, operators are increasingly looking to the Three Forks for future growth.

Key highlights:

  • USGS Estimate: 4.3 billion barrels of oil (combined Bakken/Three Forks: 7.4 billion barrels)
  • Wells Drilled: ~8,000 horizontal wells through mid-2023
  • Middle Three Forks: Showing 1-2 MMbbl EUR uplift vs. adjacent units
  • Major Activity: Continental Resources, ConocoPhillips, Chord Energy leading development

With 80% of Devon Energy's Grayson Mill acquisition in the Bakken and 20% in Three Forks, major operators are betting on this deeper target.

Researching where to invest? We grade every U.S. producing county with 4,000,000+ well records before choosing a project. See what our screening surfaced.
Researching formations? Get the investor tax guide.

The free 2026 Oil & Gas Investor Tax Guide — how the year-one deduction, depletion and working-interest rules actually work, plus oil briefs from Sean's desk. No call required.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.

Historical Background

Early History and Discovery

The Three Forks Formation was identified as a potential target during the early development of the Bakken play, as the formations are stratigraphically connected—the lower Bakken shale acts as a seal for the upper Three Forks reservoir.

Three Forks Development Timeline
2008-2010Initial Three Forks testing alongside Bakken development
2013USGS releases combined Bakken/Three Forks assessment: 7.4 billion barrels
2015-2020Upper Three Forks becomes standard completion target
2020-2023Middle Three Forks development accelerates, ~340 wells drilled
2024Devon's $5B Grayson Mill acquisition includes 300 Three Forks refrac candidates

2024 Industry Activity

  • Chord Energy: $4 billion Enerplus merger creates largest Williston operator (1.3 million net acres, 287,000 BOE/d)
  • Devon Energy: $5 billion Grayson Mill acquisition adds 500 gross locations (20% Three Forks)
  • Continental Resources: ~125 new wells planned, advancing EOR projects
  • Hess: Maintaining 200,000 BOE/d for 8-10 years from Bakken/Three Forks

Geological Characteristics

Reservoir Properties

The Three Forks Formation is a Devonian-age dolomite and siltstone sequence directly underlying the Bakken Shale. It is subdivided into upper, middle, and lower benches.

Three Forks Reservoir Properties
Formation
Three Forks
Upper Devonian
Depth Range
9,000 - 11,500 ft
Avg Thickness
250 ft
Porosity
4-10%
Oil Gravity
42° API
Light crude
Wells Drilled
~8,000

Stratigraphic Benches

  • Upper Three Forks: Most developed bench, ~8,000 wells, closest to Bakken
  • Middle Three Forks: ~340 wells, showing strong EUR uplift
  • Lower Three Forks: <50 wells, least developed but potential upside

Middle Three Forks Potential

A 2024 Hart Energy study of 25 DSUs in northeastern McKenzie County found that 17 units with middle Three Forks wells showed 1-2 MMbbl uplift in EUR compared to adjacent units without middle Three Forks development.

Drilling & Completion Economics

Estimated Well Costs (2024)
Drilling Cost
$2.5M - $4.0M
Rig, casing, cement
Frac Cost
$3.5M - $5.5M
Stimulation, proppant
Total Well Cost
$7M - $10M
Complete & equipped

Completion Design

Three Forks completions are similar to Bakken, with some operators using larger frac jobs to access the tighter dolomite:

  • Lateral Length: 10,000 - 15,000 ft (trending longer)
  • Frac Stages: 40-60+ stages
  • Proppant Loading: 2,000-3,000 lbs per lateral foot
Production Decline Characteristics

Like the Bakken above it, Three Forks wells experience steep decline:

  • Year 1 Decline: 70-78% from initial production
  • Year 2 Decline: 85-88% cumulative from IP
  • Requires continuous drilling to maintain production

Production Decline Analysis

The Shale Decline Reality

While industry headlines tout record production, the underlying data reveals a critical truth: shale wells experience dramatic production declines that require constant drilling just to maintain output. This creates a "treadmill" effect where massive capital expenditure is needed simply to prevent production collapse.

Year 1 Decline
65-75%
Production drops in first 12 months
Year 2 Decline
85-90%
Cumulative decline from IP
Conventional
5-6%
Annual decline rate
Industry Expert Analysis

"New wells drilled in 2023 may ultimately produce roughly half of what new wells from 2019 will ultimately produce. The industry is sacrificing future production to maximize short-term output."

— Art Berman, Petroleum Geologist (40+ years experience)
The Lateral Length Paradox

Since 2014, the industry has nearly tripled average lateral lengths from 5,000 ft to 14,000+ ft. While this increases initial production rates, it also accelerates decline—effectively using "wider straws" to drain reservoirs faster.

Declining Well Productivity (EUR)

Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) per well has been declining since 2019. According to petroleum geologist Art Berman, Bakken EUR dropped approximately 50% from 2020 to 2023.

Key Investment Considerations
Decline Risks
  • Hyperbolic Decline: 65-75% production loss in year 1 (vs 5-6% for conventional)
  • Child Well Problem: 85% of new wells produce less than expected
  • Inventory Exhaustion: Tier 1 acreage running out within 3-5 years
  • Treadmill Economics: Continuous drilling required just to maintain output
Counter-Perspectives
  • Technology continues improving operational efficiency
  • Infill drilling potential may extend productive life
  • Multi-zone development can maximize recovery
  • Higher commodity prices improve economics on marginal wells
Kingdom Exploration Perspective: The shale decline data presents a more nuanced picture than mainstream narratives suggest. While production records continue being set, the underlying well-level data shows accelerating decline rates and diminishing returns. Investors should carefully weigh these factors against potential returns.
Decline Analysis Data Sources
  • IEA - International Energy Agency, "The Implications of Oil and Gas Field Decline Rates" (2024)
  • EIA - U.S. Energy Information Administration, Production Decline Curve Analysis
  • SPE/JPT - Society of Petroleum Engineers, "Shale Wells Producing More Early On, Then Declining Faster Than Ever"
  • Art Berman - Petroleum Geologist, artberman.com - Shale decline analysis
  • David Hughes - Geoscientist, Post Carbon Institute - Shale production studies
  • Goehring & Rozencwajg - Natural Resource Investors, Permian Basin analysis
  • Novi Labs - Delaware Basin and shale well performance data

Remaining Potential & Future Opportunities

Development Potential

With an estimated 4.3 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil (USGS), the Three Forks offers significant remaining potential, particularly in the middle and lower benches.

Potential Opportunities
  • Middle Three Forks: 1-2 MMbbl EUR uplift demonstrated
  • Lower Three Forks: Minimally tested, potential upside
  • Refrac Potential: 300+ candidates in Devon's acquisition
  • Stacked Development: Bakken + Three Forks multi-zone
Key Risks
  • Steep Decline: 70-78% first-year production loss
  • Basin Maturity: Bakken in late-stage development
  • Child Well Interference: Potential with stacked development
  • EUR Degradation: Bakken showing declining well productivity

Investment Considerations

The Three Forks represents extension of Bakken inventory:

  • Bakken Leverage: Same infrastructure, similar operations
  • Incremental Returns: Middle Three Forks adds to DSU value
  • Operator Quality: Major operators with track records active
  • Decline Reality: Same steep decline as all tight oil plays

Conclusion

The Three Forks Formation represents a significant extension of Williston Basin tight oil inventory, offering operators additional targets beneath the maturing Bakken play.

Kingdom Exploration Assessment
Strengths
  • USGS: 4.3 billion barrels recoverable
  • Middle Three Forks: 1-2 MMbbl EUR uplift
  • Premium crude: 42° API
  • Major operator commitment (Devon, Chord, Continental)
  • Existing Bakken infrastructure
Challenges
  • Steep decline: 70-78% year-1 loss
  • Bakken EUR declining by vintage
  • Deeper = higher cost than Bakken
  • Child well interference risk
  • Basin in mature development phase

For operators already established in the Williston Basin, the Three Forks provides valuable inventory extension. The middle Three Forks in particular shows promise for incremental EUR improvement. However, investors should understand that the fundamental tight oil decline characteristics apply equally to Three Forks wells.

Data Sources & References

  • USGS - Williston Basin Bakken and Three Forks Formations Assessment (2013, updated)
  • Hart Energy - "Middle Three Forks Bench Holds Vast Untapped Oil Potential" (2024)
  • Enverus Intelligence Research - Williston Basin operator analysis, Three Forks well data
  • Devon Energy - Grayson Mill acquisition investor presentation
  • Chord Energy - Enerplus merger and Williston Basin strategy
  • Continental Resources - Williston Basin development updates
  • North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources - Three Forks well and production data
  • EIA - Drilling Productivity Report, Bakken region
  • Pruitt, Sean - Owner, Kingdom Exploration. Research compilation and analysis.
Important Disclaimer

This geological review is provided for educational and informational purposes only. The author, Sean Pruitt, is not a licensed geologist. Information presented here has been compiled from publicly available sources including USGS reports, state geological surveys, academic publications, and industry data. Reservoir properties and production data represent ranges observed across productive areas and may vary significantly by location. Kingdom Exploration makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of this information for any specific purpose. This content does not constitute investment advice, geological consulting, or professional engineering recommendations. Investors and operators should conduct their own due diligence and consult qualified licensed professionals including petroleum geologists, reservoir engineers, and financial advisors before making any investment or operational decisions.

Explore More Formations
94 Formations

Invest in Active Drilling Projects

Kingdom Exploration operates in proven formations. Request our free investment package to see current project details and projected returns.

No obligation • Available to accredited investors

Sean Pruitt – President
Sean Pruitt President, Kingdom Exploration LLC

Direct: (307) 622‑1645

Email: [email protected]

Investor Briefing

Get Your Free Investor Briefing

Answer a few quick questions to receive current project details and tax documentation.

For accredited investors · takes about 30 seconds

Call (307) 622-1645 Book a Call